![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
do you even go to this school?
To start with! There's a new SPN female character centric comm! Hey, that's great. I mean, we already have
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Except.
Except.
What is this new comm called?
spnpussypalace.
spn. pussy. palace.
I get it. Supernatural can be terribly misogynistic. Fandom is often even worse. And I hate-hate-hate that any time someone writes or runs an exchange or opens a comm or does an icon challenge or whatever focusing on the female characters, it's a protest. It's seen as a courageous act against a fandom and a show which so exclusively focuses on male characters and male relationships. It shouldn't be that way, but it is. In a fandom which is so predominantly female, being fannish about female characters is seen as deviant. How fucked up is that?
But this is not a rant about fandom's misogyny. That's been well covered.
This is a rant about how calling your women-centric, grrrl power comm "pussy palace" is not going to help anything.
Yes. "Pussy" does not have to be a negative word. We can reclaim it! We can attach power to it! By using the word, we're owning our sexuality! Hell yeah! Fuck yeah! Yay vaginas!
And I understand the impetus- that when disenfranchised groups reclaim a word that has historically been used to degrade and marginalize them, it is powerful. It's taking something which has so long been used to harm and dehumanize and turning it into a statement of both defiance and solidarity.
But guys, guys. That is not what is happening here. If women are being disenfranchised and marginalized in Supernatural fandom, it is because we ourselves- us as women- are doing it. We're not reclaiming anything. Calling something "pussy palace" is not a powerful statement, it is merely a vulgar one.
What we're doing here is looking at Supernatural's women- brave, smart, tough, vulnerable, compassionate, beautiful, inspiring, selfless, selfish, clever, funny, hurt, angry- and asking what's the most important thing about them?
And the answer is Oh! It's what's between their legs.
That is not progress.
That is demeaning.
I am not a pussy. I am not a cunt. I am not a slut or a bitch or a whore. And, unless you're one of my very, very close friends and I understand that it's meant affectionately (because I don't have a problem with reclaiming these words in the context of larger society), you're not allowed to call me any of these things.
Because my gender, because my genitalia, are such a small, insignificant part of who I am, of who any of us are. And it's not feminism and it's not progress and it's not a statement and it's not clever or brave or funny to suggest otherwise.
Onto rant number two, oh hey! It's a political one!
Oh look at that wacky Tea Party! What are they up to now? Aw, they're getting their prized son Rand Paul to be the Republican nominee for Kentucky senator.
Rand (his first name presumably from that loathsome person and poor writer, Ayn Rand) said in his victory speech last night, "I have a message from the Tea Party. Washington is horribly broken. The Tea Party movement is a message to Washington that we are angry and we want to do things differently."
Yes. The American Public (TM) is apparently very frustrated with Washington right now. Of course, the American Public (TM) is always very frustrated with Washington.
But people, my people, what are you so frustrated about?
It's the lack of jobs. It's health care. It's the continuing effects of this depression. It's the fear that we! WE ARE NOT BEING HEARD.
But who? Who is not being heard? Well, according to the NY Times poll, the Teat Party is majority white, middle class, and male. As I often remark, internet, it is is hard out there for a white male. Those poor under represented souls. And I get that. They're scared. The world is changing, and being white, male, and middle class no longer confers quite so many benefits as it once did. (For god's sake, you only have to be two of those things to be president now!) They're losing their privilege, and they're moving into a world they can no longer comprehend, so, like spoiled children, they lash out.
But this is a movement! This is an anger, this is a philosophy which is growing. People ARE worried about jobs and the economy. The government has not done enough! The government has done too much!
The Tea Party's philosophy (as near as I can tell that is has any philosophy that isn't OMG SCARY MUSLIM BLACK MAN IN OFFICE) is fundamentally economically libertarian. It's laizzes-fairre economics. They want a "small government" and "hands off approach to the economy."
Except. Except. Do they not understand? Do those now joining the movement, not realize? It is exactly those kind of policies- that dreadful, destructive thought meme of the market will work itself out- which led to the exact same predatory lending and sketchy business practices that led to the recession. They are trying to vote back in the same people who are responsible for this mess, except this time, they're crazier and angrier.
The Tea Party movement is intellectually and morally bankrupt. It is a hyper-inflation of the worst aspects of contradictory Republican thinking- that desire for a government which is small enough to not care about your neighbor's health, but is large enough to care about his soul. They can talk all they like about building communities. Their economic policies will hurt any community that isn't already well off. Their idea of a community is one where you pray to the same God and you look the same way and you marry the opposite sex and you do with your body what you're told, girl.
I feel better now.
no subject
no subject
Why does everything suck?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(his first name presumably from that loathsome person and poor writer, Ayn Rand)
*gigglesnorting*
no subject
I was staring at his first name for the longest time, all, "Rand. Rand. That's a strange name."
And then it hit me.
Why would you name your kid after her?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
YOU ARE NOT A PUSSY TOME.
TYOU ARE BEAURTIFIL TO ME.
no subject
It's spacious! Like a palace! :D
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
My apologies either way.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I am sorry you are having a bad day, boo! I LOVE YOU. YOU ARE BEST.
Also, EW RAND. TO BOTH THE WRITER (MASSIVE EW) AND POLITICIAN (MORE EW).
And I would use a hugging icon for you, but my account just expired and I'm all ;____: because almost all my icons are gone.
no subject
Thanks bb.
Aw, D: Were you forced to read Rand at some point? My poor bb.
And I'm sorry about your account expiring. That is Very Suck. But I do appreciate the icon you did choose to use!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
And can I bring Sam Winchester?(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I understand the reclaiming argument (though I don't necessarily agree with it) but I agree with you - so not what's happening here. I suspect the name comes from good old-fashioned ignorance. They say it's bliss, you know ;)
no subject
And it really is a great idea for a comm! I am just so mad I can't join because of that damn name.
no subject
But guys, guys. That is not what is happening here. If women are being disenfranchised and marginalized in Supernatural fandom, it is because we ourselves- us as women- are doing it. We're not reclaiming anything. Calling something "pussy palace" is not a powerful statement, it is merely a vulgar one.
I'm not sure I'm following. Not that I have any investment in the name, because I don't at all, but I don't really see how the use for "pussypalace" is different from other efforts to reclaim.
I get what you're saying about women being defined by virtue of their sex, but the way I see it that ship has sailed. There's no way to ignore the fact that there is sexual difference and its baggage(even if it societally constructed, which is the camp I'm in)-- thus focusing on it to point out, what else is obscured by that difference (women as brave, smart, tough, vulnerable, compassionate, beautiful, inspiring, selfless, selfish, clever, funny, hurt, angry as you mention) seems to be another strategy.
Now it may not be a strategy that suits everyone. But, I don't see how it's rhetorically not reclaiming considering who is speaking (a woman). What I can see how doing something like this may be offensive in the vein of "you don't speak for me" and "you're not in my in-group." It's not black and white to me.
no subject
And it just seems problematic to me to say what defines us as women is our genitalia. If it had been spnwomanpalace or whatever, we could have all the arguments we like about what constitutes women and gender, but there's a finality to bringing it down to gender which I don't like. And maybe that ship has sailed, societally speaking, but I still think it's something we can object to and examine.
The name itself just seems like an attempt to be shocking and edgy, without getting at the implications of using a term like "pussy" with all its entailing historical and emotional baggage. It is a divisive term, and if this is a community which has the purpose of celebrating women, it should probably not have a name which can be interpreted as degrading women. : /
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
My sense is that the disconnect lies in that I don't see "in-fandom" as a space separate from "society at large" to the extent that I read you suggesting here. So to me the usage of the word is still framed within the larger body of ideas of women's invisibility by virtue of sex (because we are literally talking about genitalia in this situation) and to society as a whole.
I won't put myself in mod's place to speculate what she was going for, but I think that there is a possibility of a variety of readings, given what I mentioned above. I don't think I'd default on that another woman does not know the historical and emotional baggage of the word "pussy," though. Whether it transgresses comfort zones is a different matter.
no subject
Although to be honest, I've seen about three Spn women comms come and go T_T
no subject
Ughhh my head hurts from all this idiocy. And re: politics... Yeah, idk. I'm an American citizen by birth but lived my entire life outside of the States, so I'll always feel like an outsider when it comes to political debate. I know in very broad terms what the political environment is like in the States right now, and when my friend explained to me what the Tea Party movement was, I think my reaction was along the lines of: "You're joking, right?"
The only thing that brings me comfort is the thought that times are changing, and for every step back we're taking two steps forward. There's still unspeakable hatred and ignorance, organizations with horrible goals and way too much power... But the younger generation, as a whole, seems to be changing their attitudes for the better. There's progress, however slow, and the fact that you are getting upset over things like this, that the hypocrisy of people in power does not escape your notice and you have the freedom to voice your concerns -- that's pretty uplifting.
... Then I watch a commercial for 16 and Pregnant and all my hopes for the ~*new generation are completely crushed.
no subject
However, I do think that the name is stupid, and damaging to the community as it will likely alienate and upset some potential members. I also think a lot of the stuff in the user info, although intentionally light hearted, I'm sure, is pretty moronic. But I did join out of interest, and from what I've seen the content is all fun and girl!loving. I will probably have a good time there, especially since the comms for the women are so dead.
I honestly have no idea what the mod was thinking when she named it, if she thought it was ~edgy and funny, or trying to be ironic or what, but no matter her intention people will interpret it in their own way and I doubt that she's taken that into consideration.
tl;dr I'm undecided about the place, but I'm sorry you're offended. <3
no subject
So...yeah. I would love to have participated in that, but I can't be part of something that calls itself that.
no subject
Naming stuff is hard, but I think they could have come up with something better. I am so tired of being shocked by this fandom though, really.
no subject
You're right, the Tea Partiers are libertarians, just with a hipper name. They've swung so far to the right that now they're just falling off the map. They've always had power as voters because they're the vocal minority. My
GodChuck, are they vocal. For months now, democratic and liberal politicians have been scared shitless of doing something to gain their attention and now that they've started voting their own ilk into office it's just going to get scarier and messier. -frets and clutches pearls- Can't we just all go back to blaming Bush for everything?As for pussypalace? Edgy bullshit + fandom + pseudo-feminism = DNW. And I'm usually all for reclamation efforts, but fandom is so not the place.
TL;DR:
no subject
Tea Party = Urgh, this makes me happy that I am no longer there /o\
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have trouble with most Libetarians on principle though, since their attitude towards all minorities seems to be "WORK AS HARD AS WE SAY YOU SHOULD AND HOPE THAT SOMEONE IS NICE ENOUGH TO THINK OF OR ACCOMMODATE YOU", which, no. Just no.
no subject
And the answer is Oh! It's what's between their legs.
*weeps*
no subject
no subject